Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 08:26
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Resilience spacecraft’s status after moon-landing attempt is unknown - CNN
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
In the last 500 years, have there been civilizations whose cruelty matched that of Nazi Germany?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The dancing monk: Why mature people don’t chase total control - Big Think
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
How to Cut Your Biological Age by Up to 16 Years: Make This Tweak to Your Daily Walk - Inc.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Lawyers could face ‘severe’ penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns - TechCrunch
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Why can’t conservatives accept the fact that they are stupid?